Pennsylvania Rep. Chrissy Houlahan says she is 'profoundly disappointed' in lack of support from GOP colleagues after Trump's sedition accusation

U.S. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, a Pennsylvania Democrat, said Friday she is “profoundly disappointed” in her Republican colleagues for not speaking up after President Donald Trump accused her and five other Democratic lawmakers of sedition.

Houlahan was one of six Democrats in Congress — all military veterans or members of the intelligence community — featured in a video urging members of the military and intelligence community to “refuse illegal orders.”

In response, Trump went after the Democrats in a string of posts on Truth Social Thursday, accusing them of of sedition that he said is “punishable by DEATH.”

Houlahan lamented at a Friday news conference in Washington that “not a single” Republican in Congress “has reached out to me, either publicly or privately” since Trump’s post.

“And with this, I am profoundly disappointed in my colleagues,” she added.

In addition to calling for the lawmakers to be arrested and tried for sedition, Trump shared posts from supporters calling for retribution against the Democrats, including one that said “HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!” and another calling them domestic terrorists.

“This is not normal political discourse,” Houlahan said Friday alongside other veteran members of Congress. “Indeed, it is, in fact, a explicit embrace of political violence against the opposition.”

“As a member who has spent my entire career calling for civility and decency and building relationships with the other side of the aisle, I’m dumbfounded by the silence,” added the Air Force veteran.

Beyond not reaching out to her specifically, Houlahan broadly said that “not a single Republican member has condemned this call for violence, not publicly, not privately.”

When reached by The Inquirer on Thursday, U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Bucks, a former FBI agent, condemned Trump’s rhetoric, but he did so without naming the president

“This exchange is part of a deeper issue of corrosive divisiveness that helps no one and puts our entire nation at risk,” he said. “Such unnecessary incidents and incendiary rhetoric heighten volatility, erode public trust, and have no place in a constitutional republic least of all in our great nation.”

When asked for clarification, his spokesperson added that he “He is 100% opposed to the president’s comments and 100% stands with all men and women who wear the uniform.”

Sen. Dave McCormick, R-Pa., said “there is no place in either party for violent rhetoric and everyone needs to dial it down a notch” in a follow-up statement to The Inquirer after initially placing blame solely on the Democrats.

Some Republicans justified Trump’s response by saying the Democrats who made the video were in the wrong — even if the president’s rhetoric was over the top.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said that he did not think the six Democrats committed “crimes punishable by death or any of that,” but criticized the Democrats’ video as irresponsible, Politico reported.

“The point we need to emphasize here is that members of Congress in the Senate [and] House should not be telling troops to disobey orders,” Johnson said. “It is dangerous.”

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, responded to a reporter asking if Trump wanted to “execute” members of Congress by saying “no,” and criticized the video put out by the veterans.

The video that inspired Trump’s ire did not point to any specific order from Trump as illegal, despite urging troops to resist such an order.

However, the video follows high-profile debates about the legality of Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops in U.S. cities and his ordering of strikes on boats in the Caribbean. Trump alleges that the boats are carrying drugs from Venezuela but experts have said his claims about them are misleading.

“He has shown time and time again that when he threatens to abuse his power, he acts on it,” Houlahan said Friday at the news conference announcing a bill that would prohibit funds for military force in or against Venezuela without congressional approval.

Houlahan said Congress has not received intelligence on the strikes. She said that Trump’s administration has “repeatedly shown disregard for the military process.”

U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., one of the bill’s sponsors, said military leaders who have expressed concern about the legality of the strikes have been “sidelined.” He also pointed out that threatening a member of Congress is against the law.

“So put yourselves in the shoes of a young lieutenant or sergeant who’s in uniform right now watching the commander-in-chief threaten members of Congress to death for telling you to follow the law,” he said. “You’re watching him orchestrate legally dubious military strikes while sidelining military lawyers and commanders who say that those actions may be illegal and could therefore get you prosecuted for following those orders.”

Moulton was not one of the six lawmakers featured in the video, but he shares a similar background having served four tours in Iraq as a Marine.

He said Congress should learn from its failure to question that war as it confronts the legality of Trump’s strikes in the Caribbean.

“I’ve seen what being in a moral and legal gray area means in war,” he said.

----------

—Staff writer Julia Terruso contributed reporting.