Orlando officials say tree count is good investment, despite DOGE criticisms
Published in Science & Technology News
ORLANDO, Fla. — Florida Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia blasted several line items in Orlando’s budget as “wasteful” spending, but by far the largest was $450,000 to count its trees.
“Maybe they’re trying to find the money tree? Oh, they already found it – it’s you the taxpayers,” Ingoglia said in October, a criticism that has been repeatedly and widely spread on social media.
But city officials contend the real story is different than Ingoglia’s snarky narrative: The count was a good investment, they say, and it wasn’t paid for by local taxpayer money at all — most of it came from permit fees paid by developers, and a good chunk of it came from the state itself.
Orlando oversees more than 110,000 trees, which shade its parks, line its streets and soak up rain, but also require trimming and pruning to keep them healthy and out of power lines and removing diseased or decaying trees before they topple in a hurricane at the city’s expense.
Over the past four years, Orlando has created a detailed database on each of its trees: its location, species, height, width, age and health.
While Ingoglia and Gov. Ron DeSantis slammed the hefty pricetag for the count as part of their quest to abolish property taxes on properties with a homestead exemption, Orlando officials said it ultimately saved taxpayers money.
It allowed the city to identify problems ahead of time, better manage crews who maintain the trees and prevent costly insurance payouts or lawsuits if a decaying tree were to fall on a vehicle or a person.
The state that awarded the city three grants totaling $70,000, with the balance paid for with a pool of money called the Street Tree Trust. That trust is funded by permit fees paid by developers who want to cut down trees as part of their construction.
The count was completed by certified arborists in July, one year ahead of schedule of about $50,000 below budget, a spokesperson said.
Among the trees counted were 34,702 live oaks, 18,839 crape myrtles and 11,276 sabal palms.
“Any tree that is on public property is the city’s responsibility,” said Lisa Early, Orlando’s Families, Parks and Recreation Director. “Any tree that looks like its getting sick or its branches are getting too low … we need to know all of that stuff so we can plan how to manage public trees.”
Nina Bassuk, a professor emeritus and founder of Cornell’s Urban Horticulture Institute, said cities across the country, big and small, do inventories to mange their urban forest.
“You do it to decrease the risk and cost of tree branch failures,” she said. “Cities do the inventories to create a master plan to mange the trees and create the best benefits for the population. It’s not just counting trees.”
Winter Park completed a similar survey in 2016, counting 25,000 trees in the city’s right-of-way and more than 75,000 total on public and private property. Its count was funded by $60,000 in grants from the U.S. Forest Service and $60,000 in city dollars.
Orlando’s inventory comes as the city was this year awarded with a Tree City USA designation by the Arbor Day Foundation for the 49th year in a row. It also comes as city officials are attempting to bolster the city’s tree canopy with more mature trees, hoping to increase the percentage of the city covered from about 30% to 40% by 2040.
Among the ways they’re pursuing that is through a free street tree program, where residents can order trees like American Sycamore, Nuttall Oak, Holly and Tabebuia to be delivered to their home for free. So far this year, the city has delivered 717 free trees.
“Tree canopy provides a lot of things for us,” said Brad Radecki, Orlando’s inventory coordinator. “From the simple stuff like shade, it reduces the temperature of the ground, which reduces the need to run your air conditioner. We do have to plan more trees, but we also have to give those trees more time to grow.”
--------------
©2025 Orlando Sentinel. Visit at orlandosentinel.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.







Comments